Re: [PATCH 06/14] cpumask: re-introduce cpumask_next{,_and}_wrap()
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-01-15 03:41:05
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-hyperv, linux-nvme, linux-pci, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linuxppc-dev, lkml, virtualization
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 11:44:32AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:38AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:quoted
cpumask_next_wrap_old() has two additional parameters, comparing to it's analogue in linux/find.h find_next_bit_wrap(). The reason for that is historical.s/it's/its/ Personally I think cscope/tags/git grep make "find_next_bit_wrap()" enough even without mentioning "linux/find.h".quoted
+ * cpumask_next_and_wrap - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p, starting from + * @n and wrapping around, if needed + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (i.e. return will be > @n)Is the return really > @n if it wraps?
No, this is a copy-paste error. Will fix in v2. Thanks, Yury