On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:27:03 +0100
Oleksij Rempel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:09:57PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 07:59:26 -0800
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 11:18:05 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
This index is not used in the series, I see later on you'll add power
evaluation strategy but that also seems to be within a domain not
device?
Doesn't it make sense to move patches 11-14 to the next series?
The other 11 patches seem to my untrained eye to reshuffle existing
stuff, so they would make sense as a cohesive series.
I think I should only drop patch 11 and 12 from this series which add something
new while the rest is reshuffle or fix code.
quoted
Indeed PSE index is used only as user information but there is nothing
correlated. You are right maybe we can add PSE index when we have something
usable for it.
No user, means, it is not exposed to the user space, it is not about
actual user space users.
I may have understood incorrectly but still. Not sure the PSE device index is
interesting for now even in the budget evaluation strategy series. It is
related to PSE power domains therefore PSE power domain index solely should be
sufficient.
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com