Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tun: Unify vnet implementation
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-01-09 14:06:12
Also in:
kvm, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, lkml, virtualization
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Both tun and tap exposes the same set of virtio-net-related features. Unify their implementations to ease future changes. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <redacted> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/net/Kconfig | 5 ++ drivers/net/Makefile | 1 + drivers/net/tap.c | 172 ++++++---------------------------------- drivers/net/tun.c | 208 ++++++++----------------------------------------- drivers/net/tun_vnet.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/tun_vnet.h | 24 ++++++ 7 files changed, 273 insertions(+), 324 deletions(-)diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 910305c11e8a..1be8a452d11f 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS@@ -23903,6 +23903,7 @@ F: Documentation/networking/tuntap.rst F: arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ F: drivers/net/tap.c F: drivers/net/tun.c +F: drivers/net/tun_vnet.h TURBOCHANNEL SUBSYSTEM M: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig index 1fd5acdc73c6..255c8f9f1d7c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig@@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ config TUN tristate "Universal TUN/TAP device driver support" depends on INET select CRC32 + select TUN_VNET
No need for this new Kconfig
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static struct proto tap_proto = { .name = "tap",@@ -641,10 +576,10 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, struct sk_buff *skb; struct tap_dev *tap; unsigned long total_len = iov_iter_count(from); - unsigned long len = total_len; + unsigned long len; int err; struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 }; - int vnet_hdr_len = 0; + int hdr_len; int copylen = 0; int depth; bool zerocopy = false;@@ -652,38 +587,20 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, enum skb_drop_reason drop_reason; if (q->flags & IFF_VNET_HDR) { - vnet_hdr_len = READ_ONCE(q->vnet_hdr_sz); - - err = -EINVAL; - if (len < vnet_hdr_len) - goto err; - len -= vnet_hdr_len; - - err = -EFAULT; - if (!copy_from_iter_full(&vnet_hdr, sizeof(vnet_hdr), from)) - goto err; - iov_iter_advance(from, vnet_hdr_len - sizeof(vnet_hdr)); - if ((vnet_hdr.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) && - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.csum_start) + - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.csum_offset) + 2 > - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len)) - vnet_hdr.hdr_len = cpu_to_tap16(q, - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.csum_start) + - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.csum_offset) + 2); - err = -EINVAL; - if (tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > len) + hdr_len = tun_vnet_hdr_get(READ_ONCE(q->vnet_hdr_sz), q->flags, from, &vnet_hdr); + if (hdr_len < 0) { + err = hdr_len; goto err; + } + } else { + hdr_len = 0; } - err = -EINVAL; - if (unlikely(len < ETH_HLEN)) - goto err; -
Is this check removal intentional?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ len = iov_iter_count(from); if (msg_control && sock_flag(&q->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) { struct iov_iter i; - copylen = vnet_hdr.hdr_len ? - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) : GOODCOPY_LEN; + copylen = hdr_len ? hdr_len : GOODCOPY_LEN; if (copylen > good_linear) copylen = good_linear; else if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)@@ -697,7 +614,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, if (!zerocopy) { copylen = len; - linear = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len); + linear = hdr_len; if (linear > good_linear) linear = good_linear; else if (linear < ETH_HLEN)@@ -732,9 +649,8 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, } skb->dev = tap->dev; - if (vnet_hdr_len) { - err = virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &vnet_hdr, - tap_is_little_endian(q)); + if (q->flags & IFF_VNET_HDR) { + err = tun_vnet_hdr_to_skb(q->flags, skb, &vnet_hdr); if (err) { rcu_read_unlock(); drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_DEV_HDR;@@ -797,23 +713,17 @@ static ssize_t tap_put_user(struct tap_queue *q, int total; if (q->flags & IFF_VNET_HDR) { - int vlan_hlen = skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0; struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr; vnet_hdr_len = READ_ONCE(q->vnet_hdr_sz); - if (iov_iter_count(iter) < vnet_hdr_len) - return -EINVAL; - - if (virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb, &vnet_hdr, - tap_is_little_endian(q), true, - vlan_hlen)) - BUG(); - if (copy_to_iter(&vnet_hdr, sizeof(vnet_hdr), iter) != - sizeof(vnet_hdr)) - return -EFAULT; + ret = tun_vnet_hdr_from_skb(q->flags, NULL, skb, &vnet_hdr); + if (ret < 0) + goto done; - iov_iter_advance(iter, vnet_hdr_len - sizeof(vnet_hdr)); + ret = tun_vnet_hdr_put(vnet_hdr_len, iter, &vnet_hdr); + if (ret < 0) + goto done;
Please split this patch in to a series of smaller patches. If feasible: 1. one that move the head of tun.c into tun_vnet.[hc]. 2. then one that uses that also in tap.c. 3. then a separate patch for the ioctl changes. 4. then introduce tun_vnet_hdr_from_skb, tun_vnet_hdr_put and friends in (a) follow-up patch(es). This is subtle code. Please report what tests you ran to ensure that it does not introduce behavioral changes / regressions.