Re: [syzbot] [riscv?] kernel panic: Kernel stack overflow (3)
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Date: 2025-01-07 13:48:46
Also in:
linux-riscv, lkml
On 24/12/2024 14:29, syzbot wrote:
Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 21f1b85c8912 riscv: mm: Do not call pmd dtor on vmemmap pa.. git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git fixes console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14d32adf980000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=90afd41d36b4291d dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f694b8c2ba2919587a3d compiler: riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 12.2.0-13) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 userspace arch: riscv64 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a741b348759c/non_bootable_disk-21f1b85c.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/69f16f8d759e/vmlinux-21f1b85c.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1e170e1b7a02/Image-21f1b85c.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+f694b8c2ba2919587a3d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com s11: ff6000001cefcec0 t3 : ff6000001cefd9e0 t4 : 1fec0000039dfb3b t5 : 1fec0000039dfba9 t6 : 0000000000000015 status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: ff20000005acff40 cause: 000000000000000f Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel stack overflow CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11449 Comm: syz.2.1759 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-g21f1b85c8912 #0 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) Call Trace: [<ffffffff80071bae>] dump_backtrace+0x2e/0x3c arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:130 [<ffffffff8000325c>] show_stack+0x30/0x3c arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:136 [<ffffffff8005e1d6>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] [<ffffffff8005e1d6>] dump_stack_lvl+0x110/0x1a6 lib/dump_stack.c:120 [<ffffffff8005e288>] dump_stack+0x1c/0x24 lib/dump_stack.c:129 [<ffffffff80003e62>] panic+0x38c/0x86e kernel/panic.c:354 [<ffffffff80071372>] handle_bad_stack+0xd4/0xfc arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c:427 [<ffffffff802b37e2>] mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4658 [inline] [<ffffffff802b37e2>] __lock_acquire+0xaa6/0x8594 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5180 SMP: stopping secondary CPUs Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
We have the same stack size as x86 and arm64, which is 32KB. Given the fault address (ff20000005acff40), we indeed overflow the kernel stack: [ 5560.063329][T11449] Task stack: [0xff20000005ad0000..0xff20000005ad8000] I noticed the following warning right before we lack space on the stack (which in the comments indicate a "recursion"): [ 5560.055175][T11449] Dead loop on virtual device ipvlan1, fix it urgently! Can the overflow be explained by this? Or should we again increase stack space? Or could this be a riscv specific issue? I have no idea, so +cc netdev in case they can explain this. Thanks for your help, Alex