Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2025-01-14

Re: [PATCH net-next] tsnep: Link queues to NAPIs

From: Joe Damato <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-13 22:36:38

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:31:09PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:20:56 -0800 Joe Damato wrote:
quoted
quoted
XDP and AF_XDP are different things. The XDP part of AF_XDP is to some
extent for advertising purposes :) If memory serves me well:

XDP Tx -> these are additional queues automatically allocated for
          in-kernel XDP, allocated when XDP is attached on Rx.
          These should _not_ be listed in netlink queue, or NAPI;
          IOW should not be linked to NAPI instances.
XDP Rx -> is not a thing, XDP attaches to stack queues, there are no
          dedicated XDP Rx queues
AF_XDP -> AF_XDP "takes over" stack queues. It's a bit of a gray area.
          I don't recall if we made a call on these being linked, but
          they could probably be listed like devmem as a queue with
          an extra attribute, not a completely separate queue type.  
Sorry to be an annoyance, but could this be added to docs somewhere?

I think I did the AF_XDP case I did two different ways; exported for
mlx5, but (iiuc) not exporter for igc.
Yes, I think netdev.yaml is the best place to document the meaning of
rx and tx queue type. Are you going to take a stab at it?
I'll give it a try, why not.
quoted
I don't want to hijack Gerhard's thread; maybe I should start a new
thread to double check that the drivers I modified are right?
Ideally we'd have a test for this. How is your Python?
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/queues.py
Good idea. My python is non-existent, but since I'm the one who
submit all the driver patches...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help