Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 net 1/7] net: hns3: fixed reset failure issues caused by the incorrect reset type
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-12-19 09:41:59
Also in:
lkml
On 12/18/24 10:02, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:08:33AM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:quoted
From: Hao Lan <redacted> When a reset type that is not supported by the driver is input, a reset pending flag bit of the HNAE3_NONE_RESET type is generated in reset_pending. The driver does not have a mechanism to clear this type of error. As a result, the driver considers that the reset is not complete. This patch provides a mechanism to clear the HNAE3_NONE_RESET flag and the parameter of hnae3_ae_ops.set_default_reset_request is verified. The error message: hns3 0000:39:01.0: cmd failed -16 hns3 0000:39:01.0: hclge device re-init failed, VF is disabled! hns3 0000:39:01.0: failed to reset VF stack hns3 0000:39:01.0: failed to reset VF(4) hns3 0000:39:01.0: prepare reset(2) wait done hns3 0000:39:01.0 eth4: already uninitialized Use the crash tool to view struct hclgevf_dev: struct hclgevf_dev { ... default_reset_request = 0x20, reset_level = HNAE3_NONE_RESET, reset_pending = 0x100, reset_type = HNAE3_NONE_RESET, ... }; Fixes: 720bd5837e37 ("net: hns3: add set_default_reset_request in the hnae3_ae_ops") Signed-off-by: Hao Lan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
I haven't signed-off this patch. Still no need to repost (yet) for this if the following points are solved rapidly (as I may end-up merging the series and really adding my SoB), but please avoid this kind of issue in the future.
quoted
@@ -4227,7 +4240,7 @@ static bool hclge_reset_err_handle(struct hclge_dev *hdev) return false; } else if (hdev->rst_stats.reset_fail_cnt < MAX_RESET_FAIL_CNT) { hdev->rst_stats.reset_fail_cnt++; - set_bit(hdev->reset_type, &hdev->reset_pending); + hclge_set_reset_pending(hdev, hdev->reset_type);Sth is unclear for me here. Doesn't HNAE3_NONE_RESET mean that there is no reset? If yes, why in this case reset_fail_cnt++ is increasing? Maybe the check for NONE_RESET should be done in this else if check to prevent reset_fail_cnt from increasing (and also solve the problem with pending bit set)
@Michal: I don't understand your comment above. hclge_reset_err_handle() handles attempted reset failures. I don't see it triggered when reset_type == HNAE3_NONE_RESET.
quoted
@@ -4470,8 +4483,20 @@ static void hclge_reset_event(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct hnae3_handle *handle) static void hclge_set_def_reset_request(struct hnae3_ae_dev *ae_dev, enum hnae3_reset_type rst_type) { +#define HCLGE_SUPPORT_RESET_TYPE \ + (BIT(HNAE3_FLR_RESET) | BIT(HNAE3_FUNC_RESET) | \ + BIT(HNAE3_GLOBAL_RESET) | BIT(HNAE3_IMP_RESET)) + struct hclge_dev *hdev = ae_dev->priv; + if (!(BIT(rst_type) & HCLGE_SUPPORT_RESET_TYPE)) { + /* To prevent reset triggered by hclge_reset_event */ + set_bit(HNAE3_NONE_RESET, &hdev->default_reset_request); + dev_warn(&hdev->pdev->dev, "unsupported reset type %d\n", + rst_type); + return; + }Maybe (nit): if (...) { rst_type = dev_warn(); } set_bit(rst_type, ); It is a little hard to follow with return in the if.
@Michal: I personally find the patch code quite readable, do you have strong opinions here?
quoted
set_bit(rst_type, &hdev->default_reset_request); }diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c index 2f6ffb88e700..fd0abe37fdd7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c@@ -1393,6 +1393,17 @@ static int hclgevf_notify_roce_client(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, return ret; } +static void hclgevf_set_reset_pending(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, + enum hnae3_reset_type reset_type) +{ + /* When an incorrect reset type is executed, the get_reset_level + * function generates the HNAE3_NONE_RESET flag. As a result, this + * type do not need to pending. + */ + if (reset_type != HNAE3_NONE_RESET) + set_bit(reset_type, &hdev->reset_pending); +}You already have a way to share the code between PF and VF, so please move the same functions to common file in one direction up.
AFAICS this can't be shared short of a large refactor not suitable for net as the functions eligible for sharing operate on different structs with different layout (hclgevf_dev vs hclge_dev). Currently all the shared code operates on shared structs. Cheers, Paolo