On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 09:00:32AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - ethernet-phy-id2000.0181
There's nothing specific here, can someone remind me why the generic
binding is not enough?
The missing binding was blamed by checkpatch. Haw should I proceed with this
patch?
Does dtbs_check complain when you use it in a dts? What you have here
matches against the pattern ^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$
so I think it won't. checkpatch might be too dumb to evaluate the regex?
dtbs_check didn't complained about it, only checkpatch.
Checkpatch is not a reason to add bindings. Missing binding would be a
reason (e.g. pointed out by dtschema), but I understand this is not the
case here, so drop the patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof