Re: [PATCH net-next v12 11/22] ovpn: implement TCP transport
flat view
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-12-03 15:19:52
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
On 12/2/24 16:07, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+void ovpn_tcp_socket_detach(struct socket *sock) +{ + struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_sock; + struct ovpn_peer *peer; + + if (!sock) + return; + + rcu_read_lock(); + ovpn_sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk); + + if (!ovpn_sock->peer) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return; + } + + peer = ovpn_sock->peer; + strp_stop(&peer->tcp.strp); + + skb_queue_purge(&peer->tcp.user_queue); + + /* restore CBs that were saved in ovpn_sock_set_tcp_cb() */ + sock->sk->sk_data_ready = peer->tcp.sk_cb.sk_data_ready; + sock->sk->sk_write_space = peer->tcp.sk_cb.sk_write_space; + sock->sk->sk_prot = peer->tcp.sk_cb.prot; + sock->sk->sk_socket->ops = peer->tcp.sk_cb.ops; + /* drop reference to peer */ + rcu_assign_sk_user_data(sock->sk, NULL); + + rcu_read_unlock(); + + barrier();
It's unclear to me the role of the above barrier. A comment would help
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ /* cancel any ongoing work. Done after removing the CBs so that these + * workers cannot be re-armed + */ + cancel_work_sync(&peer->tcp.tx_work); + strp_done(&peer->tcp.strp); + skb_queue_purge(&peer->tcp.out_queue); + + ovpn_peer_put(peer); +} + +static void ovpn_tcp_send_sock(struct ovpn_peer *peer) +{ + struct sk_buff *skb = peer->tcp.out_msg.skb; + + if (!skb) + return; + + if (peer->tcp.tx_in_progress) + return; + + peer->tcp.tx_in_progress = true; + + do { + int ret = skb_send_sock_locked(peer->sock->sock->sk, skb, + peer->tcp.out_msg.offset, + peer->tcp.out_msg.len); + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { + if (ret == -EAGAIN) + goto out; + + net_warn_ratelimited("%s: TCP error to peer %u: %d\n", + netdev_name(peer->ovpn->dev), + peer->id, ret); + + /* in case of TCP error we can't recover the VPN + * stream therefore we abort the connection + */ + ovpn_peer_del(peer, + OVPN_DEL_PEER_REASON_TRANSPORT_ERROR); + break; + } + + peer->tcp.out_msg.len -= ret; + peer->tcp.out_msg.offset += ret; + } while (peer->tcp.out_msg.len > 0); + + if (!peer->tcp.out_msg.len) + dev_sw_netstats_tx_add(peer->ovpn->dev, 1, skb->len); + + kfree_skb(peer->tcp.out_msg.skb); + peer->tcp.out_msg.skb = NULL; + peer->tcp.out_msg.len = 0; + peer->tcp.out_msg.offset = 0; + +out: + peer->tcp.tx_in_progress = false; +} + +static void ovpn_tcp_tx_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ovpn_peer *peer; + + peer = container_of(work, struct ovpn_peer, tcp.tx_work); + + lock_sock(peer->sock->sock->sk); + ovpn_tcp_send_sock(peer); + release_sock(peer->sock->sock->sk); +} + +static void ovpn_tcp_send_sock_skb(struct ovpn_peer *peer, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if (peer->tcp.out_msg.skb) + ovpn_tcp_send_sock(peer); + + if (peer->tcp.out_msg.skb) { + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(peer->ovpn->dev); + kfree_skb(skb); + return; + } + + peer->tcp.out_msg.skb = skb; + peer->tcp.out_msg.len = skb->len; + peer->tcp.out_msg.offset = 0; + ovpn_tcp_send_sock(peer); +} + +void ovpn_tcp_send_skb(struct ovpn_peer *peer, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + u16 len = skb->len; + + *(__be16 *)__skb_push(skb, sizeof(u16)) = htons(len); + + bh_lock_sock(peer->sock->sock->sk);
Are you sure this runs in BH context? AFAICS we reach here from an AEAD callback.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ if (sock_owned_by_user(peer->sock->sock->sk)) { + if (skb_queue_len(&peer->tcp.out_queue) >= + READ_ONCE(net_hotdata.max_backlog)) { + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(peer->ovpn->dev); + kfree_skb(skb); + goto unlock; + } + __skb_queue_tail(&peer->tcp.out_queue, skb); + } else { + ovpn_tcp_send_sock_skb(peer, skb); + } +unlock: + bh_unlock_sock(peer->sock->sock->sk); +}
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static void ovpn_tcp_build_protos(struct proto *new_prot, + struct proto_ops *new_ops, + const struct proto *orig_prot, + const struct proto_ops *orig_ops); + +/* Set TCP encapsulation callbacks */ +int ovpn_tcp_socket_attach(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_peer *peer) +{ + struct strp_callbacks cb = { + .rcv_msg = ovpn_tcp_rcv, + .parse_msg = ovpn_tcp_parse, + }; + int ret; + + /* make sure no pre-existing encapsulation handler exists */ + if (sock->sk->sk_user_data) + return -EBUSY; + + /* sanity check */ + if (sock->sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) { + net_err_ratelimited("%s: provided socket is not TCP as expected\n", + netdev_name(peer->ovpn->dev)); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* only a fully connected socket are expected. Connection should be + * handled in userspace + */ + if (sock->sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) { + net_err_ratelimited("%s: provided TCP socket is not in ESTABLISHED state: %d\n", + netdev_name(peer->ovpn->dev), + sock->sk->sk_state); + return -EINVAL; + } + + lock_sock(sock->sk); + + ret = strp_init(&peer->tcp.strp, sock->sk, &cb); + if (ret < 0) { + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + release_sock(sock->sk); + return ret; + } + + INIT_WORK(&peer->tcp.tx_work, ovpn_tcp_tx_work); + __sk_dst_reset(sock->sk); + skb_queue_head_init(&peer->tcp.user_queue); + skb_queue_head_init(&peer->tcp.out_queue); + + /* save current CBs so that they can be restored upon socket release */ + peer->tcp.sk_cb.sk_data_ready = sock->sk->sk_data_ready; + peer->tcp.sk_cb.sk_write_space = sock->sk->sk_write_space; + peer->tcp.sk_cb.prot = sock->sk->sk_prot; + peer->tcp.sk_cb.ops = sock->sk->sk_socket->ops; + + /* assign our static CBs and prot/ops */ + sock->sk->sk_data_ready = ovpn_tcp_data_ready; + sock->sk->sk_write_space = ovpn_tcp_write_space; + + if (sock->sk->sk_family == AF_INET) { + sock->sk->sk_prot = &ovpn_tcp_prot; + sock->sk->sk_socket->ops = &ovpn_tcp_ops; + } else { + mutex_lock(&tcp6_prot_mutex); + if (!ovpn_tcp6_prot.recvmsg) + ovpn_tcp_build_protos(&ovpn_tcp6_prot, &ovpn_tcp6_ops, + sock->sk->sk_prot, + sock->sk->sk_socket->ops); + mutex_unlock(&tcp6_prot_mutex);
This looks like an hack to avoid a build dependency on IPV6, I think the explicit #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) at init time should be preferable
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ + sock->sk->sk_prot = &ovpn_tcp6_prot; + sock->sk->sk_socket->ops = &ovpn_tcp6_ops; + }
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static void ovpn_tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) +{ + struct ovpn_socket *sock; + + rcu_read_lock(); + sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk); + + strp_stop(&sock->peer->tcp.strp); + barrier();
Again, is not clear to me the role of the above barrier, please document it. Thanks, Paolo