Re: [PATCH net-next v8 03/10] lib: packing: add pack_fields() and unpack_fields()
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2024-12-05 09:52:32
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 12:43:35AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
On 12/4/24 18:12, Vladimir Oltean wrote:quoted
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 03:53:49PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:Amazing stuff :), I really like the fact that you both keep striving for the best result, even way past the point of cut off of most other ;)
It's all Jake. I openly admit I would have given up and not followed through with the review feedback to go to modpost and back. Additionally, the __builtin_choose_expr() breakthrough was all his. Jake's determination, perseverence, discipline and level of skill are something to aspire to. It's safe to say that without him, this set would have gotten nowhere.
prior to the change CHECK_PACKED_FIELD() was called on values smaller than MAX_PACKED_FIELD_SIZE, compare with [j] above, now you call it also for the MAX one
(...)
off by one error? see above
Yes, indeed, thank you for pointing this out. Jake also replied a few minutes prior to your message.
PS. incremental diff in a single patch is harder to apply, but easier to review, comment both in a single reply == great idea
I'm interpreting this as a positive comment :) I got mixed feedback about posting diffs in reply to patches, it seems to confuse b4 when applying.