On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 9:12 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:

From: Daniel Xu <redacted>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:10:06 -0700

quoted

Hi Olek,

Here are the results.

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 03:39:13PM GMT, Daniel Xu wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:

[...]

quoted

Baseline (again)

	Transactions	Latency P50 (s)	Latency P90 (s)	Latency P99 (s)			Throughput (Mbit/s)
Run 1	3169917	        0.00007295	0.00007871	0.00009343		Run 1	21749.43
Run 2	3228290	        0.00007103	0.00007679	0.00009215		Run 2	21897.17
Run 3	3226746	        0.00007231	0.00007871	0.00009087		Run 3	21906.82
Run 4	3191258	        0.00007231	0.00007743	0.00009087		Run 4	21155.15
Run 5	3235653	        0.00007231	0.00007743	0.00008703		Run 5	21397.06
Average	3210372.8	0.000072182	0.000077814	0.00009087		Average	21621.126

cpumap v2 Olek

	Transactions	Latency P50 (s)	Latency P90 (s)	Latency P99 (s)			Throughput (Mbit/s)
Run 1	3253651	        0.00007167	0.00007807	0.00009343		Run 1	13497.57
Run 2	3221492	        0.00007231	0.00007743	0.00009087		Run 2	12115.53
Run 3	3296453	        0.00007039	0.00007807	0.00009087		Run 3	12323.38
Run 4	3254460	        0.00007167	0.00007807	0.00009087		Run 4	12901.88
Run 5	3173327	        0.00007295	0.00007871	0.00009215		Run 5	12593.22
Average	3239876.6	0.000071798	0.00007807	0.000091638		Average	12686.316
Delta	0.92%	        -0.53%	        0.33%	        0.85%			        -41.32%


It's very interesting that we see -40% tput w/ the patches. I went back

Oh no, I messed up something =\

Could you please also test not the whole series, but patches 1-3 (up to
"bpf:cpumap: switch to GRO...") and 1-4 (up to "bpf: cpumap: reuse skb
array...")? Would be great to see whether this implementation works
worse right from the start or I just broke something later on.

Patches 1-3 reproduces the -40% tput numbers. 

With patches 1-4 the numbers get slightly worse (~1gbps lower) but it was noisy.

tcp_rr results were unaffected.

Thanks,
Daniel