Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] vhost: Add kthread support in function vhost_worker_create
From: Cindy Lu <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-27 06:44:28
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 5:20 AM [off-list ref] wrote:
On 11/5/24 1:25 AM, Cindy Lu wrote:quoted
static struct vhost_worker *vhost_worker_create(struct vhost_dev *dev) { struct vhost_worker *worker; - struct vhost_task *vtsk; + struct vhost_task *vtsk = NULL; + struct task_struct *task = NULL; char name[TASK_COMM_LEN]; int ret; u32 id; + /* Allocate resources for the worker */ worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); if (!worker) return NULL; + worker->fn = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vhost_task_fn), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); + if (!worker->fn) { + kfree(worker); + return NULL; + }Why dynamically allocate this? You could probably even just kill the vhost_task_fn struct since we just have to the 2 callouts.
sure, will change this
quoted
+ worker->dev = dev; snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vhost-%d", current->pid); - vtsk = vhost_task_create(vhost_run_work_list, vhost_worker_killed, - worker, name); - if (!vtsk) - goto free_worker; - mutex_init(&worker->mutex); init_llist_head(&worker->work_list); worker->kcov_handle = kcov_common_handle(); - worker->vtsk = vtsk; - vhost_task_start(vtsk); + if (dev->inherit_owner) { + /* Create and start a vhost task */Maybe instead of this comment and the one below write something about what inherit_owner means. We can see from the code we are creating a vhost/kthread, but it's not really obvious why. Something like: /* * If inherit_owner is true we use vhost_tasks to create * the worker so all settings/limits like cgroups, NPROC, * scheduler, etc are inherited from the owner. If false, * we use kthreads and only attach to the same cgroups * as the owner for compat with older kernels. */
Thanks, Mike, I will change this
quoted
+ vtsk = vhost_task_create(vhost_run_work_list, + vhost_worker_killed, worker, name); + if (!vtsk) + goto free_worker; + + worker->vtsk = vtsk; + worker->fn->wakeup = vhost_task_wakeup_fn; + worker->fn->stop = vhost_task_stop_fn; + + vhost_task_start(vtsk); + } else { + /* Create and start a kernel thread */ + task = kthread_create(vhost_run_work_kthread_list, worker, + "vhost-%d", current->pid); + if (IS_ERR(task)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(task); + goto free_worker; + } + worker->task = task; + worker->fn->wakeup = vhost_kthread_wakeup_fn; + worker->fn->stop = vhost_kthread_stop_fn; + + wake_up_process(task); + /* Attach to the vhost cgroup */You don't need this comment do you? The function name tells us the same info.
sure, Will remove this
quoted
+ ret = vhost_attach_cgroups(dev);I don't think this works. Patch 3/9 did: + xa_for_each(&dev->worker_xa, i, worker) { + ret = vhost_worker_cgroups_kthread(worker); but we don't add the worker to the xa until below. You also want to just call vhost_worker_cgroups_kthread above, because you only want to add the one task and not loop over all of them. I would then also maybe rename vhost_worker_cgroups_kthread to something like vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups.
Will fix this. Thanks
quoted
+ if (ret) + goto stop_worker; + } ret = xa_alloc(&dev->worker_xa, &id, worker, xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL); if (ret < 0) goto stop_worker; worker->id = id; - return worker; - stop_worker: - vhost_task_stop(vtsk); + worker->fn->stop(dev->inherit_owner ? (void *)vtsk : (void *)task);I don't think you need to cast since the function takes a void pointer. Same comment for the other patches like 6/9 where you are calling the callout and casting.
Sure, Thanks I will rewrite this part Thanks cindy