On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:27:28PM -0700, Everest K.C. wrote:

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 3:59 AM Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 04:36:06PM -0700, Everest K.C. wrote:

quoted

Error handling is missing when call to nla_put_u32() fails.
Handle the error when the call to nla_put_u32() returns an error.

The error was reported by Coverity Scan.
Report:
CID 1601525: (#1 of 1): Unused value (UNUSED_VALUE)
returned_value: Assigning value from nla_put_u32(skb, XFRMA_SA_PCPU, x->pcpu_num)
to err here, but that stored value is overwritten before it can be used

Fixes: 1ddf9916ac09 ("xfrm: Add support for per cpu xfrm state handling.")
Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <redacted>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

For future reference, I think the appropriate target for this tree
is ipsec-next rather than next.

        Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: ...

Should I send a patch to ipsec-next ?

No need to resend. This is now applied to ipsec-next,
thanks a lot!