Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2024-10-08

Re: [PATCH RFC net] docs: netdev: document guidance on cleanup patches

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-10-07 16:54:13
Also in: linux-doc, workflows

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:15:01 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
quoted
We could merge or otherwise rearrange that section with the one proposed by
this patch. But I didn't feel it was necessary last week.  
Somewhat, we don't push back on correct use of device-managed APIs.
But converting ancient drivers to be device-managed just to save 
2 or 3 LoC is pointless churn. Which in my mind falls squarely
under the new section, the new section is intended for people sending
trivial patches.  
Thanks, I can try and work with that. Do you want to call out older drivers
too? I was intentionally skipping that for now. But I do agree it should
be mentioned at some point.
What is and isn't considered old may be hard to determine. I hope that
your existing "not part of other work" phrasing will give us the same
effect, as there's usually no other work for old drivers.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help