Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] [net-next] igb: Fix spelling in igb_main.c
From: Paul Menzel <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-23 08:05:32
Also in:
intel-wired-lan, kernel-janitors, lkml
Dear Johnny, Thank you for your patch. I recommend to put the information, that the typos are only in comments, to the summary/title: igb: Fix 2 typos in comments in igb_main.c That way, skimming `git log --oneline` is more informative. Am 23.10.24 um 05:21 schrieb Johnny Park:
Simple patch that fix spelling mistakes in igb_main.c
fix*es*, but better use imperative mood: Fix 2 spelling mistakes in comments `igb_main.c`.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Johnny Park <redacted> --- Changes in v2: - Fix spelling mor -> more --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c index 1ef4cb871452..fc587304b3c0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static int igb_alloc_q_vector(struct igb_adapter *adapter, /* initialize pointer to rings */ ring = q_vector->ring; - /* intialize ITR */ + /* initialize ITR */ if (rxr_count) { /* rx or rx/tx vector */ if (!adapter->rx_itr_setting || adapter->rx_itr_setting > 3)@@ -3906,7 +3906,7 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) * * This function initializes the vf specific data storage and then attempts to * allocate the VFs. The reason for ordering it this way is because it is much - * mor expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free + * more expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free * the memory for the VFs. **/ static void igb_probe_vfs(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
Rest looks good. Kind regards, Paul