RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] i40e: Fix macvlan leak by synchronizing access to mac_filter_hash
From: Romanowski, Rafal <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-03 12:03:43
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
-----Original Message----- From: Intel-wired-lan <redacted> On Behalf Of Simon Horman Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 8:57 AM To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <redacted> Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kubalewski, Arkadiusz [off-list ref]; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] i40e: Fix macvlan leak by synchronizing access to mac_filter_hash On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:12:19AM +0200, Aleksandr Loktionov wrote:quoted
This patch addresses a macvlan leak issue in the i40e driver caused by concurrent access to vsi->mac_filter_hash. The leak occurs when multiple threads attempt to modify the mac_filter_hash simultaneously, leading to inconsistent state and potential memory leaks. To fix this, we now wrap the calls to i40e_del_mac_filter() and zeroing vf->default_lan_addr.addr with vf->spin_lock/unlock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock), ensuring atomic operations and preventing concurrent access. Additionally, we add lockdep_assert_held(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock) in i40e_add_mac_filter() to help catch similar issues in the future. Reproduction steps: 1. Spawn VFs and configure port vlan on them. 2. Trigger concurrent macvlan operations (e.g., adding and deleting portvlan and/or mac filters). 3. Observe the potential memory leak and inconsistent state in the mac_filter_hash. This synchronization ensures the integrity of the mac_filter_hash and prevents the described leak. Fixes: fed0d9f13266 ("i40e: Fix VF's MAC Address change on VM") Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <redacted>Thanks Aleksandr, I see that: 1) All calls to i40e_add_mac_filter() and all other calls to i40e_del_mac_filter() are already protected by vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock. 2) i40e_del_mac_filter() already asserts that vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock is held. So this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> ...
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <redacted>