Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Fix accessing first syscall argument on RV64
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2024-09-04 20:30:30
Also in:
bpf, linux-riscv
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2024-09-04 20:30:30
Also in:
bpf, linux-riscv
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref]: On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 04:19:30 +0000 you wrote:
On RV64, as Ilya mentioned before [0], the first syscall parameter should be accessed through orig_a0 (see arch/riscv64/include/asm/syscall.h), otherwise it will cause selftests like bpf_syscall_macro, vmlinux, test_lsm, etc. to fail on RV64. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-1-iii@linux.ibm.com (local) [0] [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/4] libbpf: Access first syscall argument with CO-RE direct read on s390
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/65ee11d9c822
- [bpf-next,v3,2/4] libbpf: Access first syscall argument with CO-RE direct read on arm64
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ebd8ad474888
- [bpf-next,v3,3/4] selftests/bpf: Enable test_bpf_syscall_macro:syscall_arg1 on s390 and arm64
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3a913c4d62e1
- [bpf-next,v3,4/4] libbpf: Fix accessing first syscall argument on RV64
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/13143c5816bc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html