Re: [PATCH net] net: tighten bad gso csum offset check in virtio_net_hdr
From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2024-09-10 06:12:32
Also in:
stable
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 8:40 AM Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> The referenced commit drops bad input, but has false positives. Tighten the check to avoid these. The check detects illegal checksum offload requests, which produce csum_start/csum_off beyond end of packet after segmentation. But it is based on two incorrect assumptions: 1. virtio_net_hdr_to_skb with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCP[46] implies GSO. True in callers that inject into the tx path, such as tap. But false in callers that inject into rx, like virtio-net. Here, the flags indicate GRO, and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY or CHECKSUM_NONE without VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM is normal. 2. TSO requires checksum offload, i.e., ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. False, as tcp[46]_gso_segment will fix up csum_start and offset for all other ip_summed by calling __tcp_v4_send_check. Because of 2, we can limit the scope of the fix to virtio_net_hdr that do try to set these fields, with a bogus value. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240909094527.GA3048202@port70.net/ (local) Fixes: 89add40066f9 ("net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr") Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Cc: <redacted> --- Verified that the syzbot repro is still caught. An equivalent alternative would be to move the check for csum_offset to where the csum_start check is in segmentation: - if (unlikely(skb_checksum_start(skb) != skb_transport_header(skb))) + if (unlikely(skb_checksum_start(skb) != skb_transport_header(skb) || + skb->csum_offset != offsetof(struct tcphdr, check))) Cleaner, but messier stable backport. We'll need an equivalent patch to this for VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_L4. But that csum_offset test was in a different commit, so different
Not for this patch, but I see this in UDP_L4:
if (!(hdr->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM))
return -EINVAL;
This seems to forbid VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID. I wonder what's the
reason for doing this.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes tag. --- include/linux/virtio_net.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h index 6c395a2600e8d..276ca543ef44d 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h@@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, break; case SKB_GSO_TCPV4: case SKB_GSO_TCPV6: - if (skb->csum_offset != offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)) + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && + skb->csum_offset != offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)) return -EINVAL; break; } --2.46.0.598.g6f2099f65c-goog
Acked-by: Jason Wang <redacted> Thanks