On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
quoted hunk
@@ -2251,7 +2261,16 @@ static void enetc_disable_txbdr(struct enetc_hw *hw, struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring)
enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR, 0);
}
-static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
+static void enetc_disable_rx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
+{
+ struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
+ enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]);
+}
+
+static void enetc_disable_tx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
{
struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw;
int i;@@ -2259,8 +2278,6 @@ static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
enetc_disable_txbdr(hw, priv->tx_ring[i]);
Please do not leave a blank line here. In the git tree after applying
this patch, that blank line appears at the end of enetc_disable_tx_bdrs().
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
- enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]);
}