Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 4 authors, 2024-09-27

Re: [PATCH net-next v7 04/25] ovpn: add basic netlink support

From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-09-26 15:06:42

On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 12:36, Antonio Quartulli [off-list ref] wrote:
Donald,

I see most (if not all) modules have named ops dev-del/add/get, while in
ovpn I am going with new/del-dev (action and object are inverted).

Do you think it'd make sense to change all the op names to follow the
convention used by the other modules?
It's a good question. I'm not sure there's much consistency for either format:

Total ops: 231
Starts with (new|get|del): 51
Ends with (new|get|del): 63
Exactly (new|get|del): 11

For the legacy and raw specs that I have written, I followed whatever
convention was used for the enums in the UAPI, e.g. getroute from
RTM_GETROUTE. The newer genetlink specs like netdev.yaml mostly favour
the dev-get form so maybe that's the convention we should try to
establish going forward?

Cheers,
Donald.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help