Re: [PATCH net-next v15 06/13] mm: page_frag: reuse existing space for 'size' and 'pfmemalloc'
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-26 16:47:27
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:46 AM Yunsheng Lin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Currently there is one 'struct page_frag' for every 'struct sock' and 'struct task_struct', we are about to replace the 'struct page_frag' with 'struct page_frag_cache' for them. Before begin the replacing, we need to ensure the size of 'struct page_frag_cache' is not bigger than the size of 'struct page_frag', as there may be tens of thousands of 'struct sock' and 'struct task_struct' instances in the system. By or'ing the page order & pfmemalloc with lower bits of 'va' instead of using 'u16' or 'u32' for page size and 'u8' for pfmemalloc, we are able to avoid 3 or 5 bytes space waste. And page address & pfmemalloc & order is unchanged for the same page in the same 'page_frag_cache' instance, it makes sense to fit them together. After this patch, the size of 'struct page_frag_cache' should be the same as the size of 'struct page_frag'. CC: Alexander Duyck <redacted> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <redacted> --- include/linux/mm_types_task.h | 19 ++++++----- include/linux/page_frag_cache.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- mm/page_frag_cache.c | 51 +++++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h index cdc1e3696439..a8635460e027 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h@@ -50,18 +50,21 @@ struct page_frag { #define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE __ALIGN_MASK(32768, ~PAGE_MASK) #define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER get_order(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) struct page_frag_cache { - void *va; -#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) + /* encoded_page consists of the virtual address, pfmemalloc bit and order + * of a page. + */ + unsigned long encoded_page; + + /* we maintain a pagecount bias, so that we dont dirty cache line + * containing page->_refcount every time we allocate a fragment. + */ +#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) && (BITS_PER_LONG <= 32) __u16 offset; - __u16 size; + __u16 pagecnt_bias; #else __u32 offset; + __u32 pagecnt_bias; #endif - /* we maintain a pagecount bias, so that we dont dirty cache line - * containing page->_refcount every time we allocate a fragment. - */ - unsigned int pagecnt_bias; - bool pfmemalloc; }; /* Track pages that require TLB flushes */diff --git a/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h b/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h index 0a52f7a179c8..372d6ed7e20a 100644 --- a/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h +++ b/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h@@ -3,18 +3,74 @@ #ifndef _LINUX_PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_H #define _LINUX_PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_H +#include <linux/bits.h> +#include <linux/build_bug.h> #include <linux/log2.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/mm_types_task.h> #include <linux/types.h> +#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) +/* Use a full byte here to enable assembler optimization as the shift + * operation is usually expecting a byte. + */ +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT 8 +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT BIT(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT) +#else +/* Compiler should be able to figure out we don't read things as any value + * ANDed with 0 is 0. + */ +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK 0 +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT 0 +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT BIT(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT) +#endif + +static inline unsigned long page_frag_encode_page(struct page *page, + unsigned int order, + bool pfmemalloc) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER > PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK); + BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT >= PAGE_SIZE); + + return (unsigned long)page_address(page) | + (order & PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK) | + ((unsigned long)pfmemalloc << PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT); +} + +static inline unsigned long page_frag_encoded_page_order(unsigned long encoded_page) +{ + return encoded_page & PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK; +} + +static inline bool page_frag_encoded_page_pfmemalloc(unsigned long encoded_page) +{ + return !!(encoded_page & PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT); +} + +static inline void *page_frag_encoded_page_address(unsigned long encoded_page) +{ + return (void *)(encoded_page & PAGE_MASK); +} + +static inline struct page *page_frag_encoded_page_ptr(unsigned long encoded_page) +{ + return virt_to_page((void *)encoded_page); +} + static inline void page_frag_cache_init(struct page_frag_cache *nc) { - nc->va = NULL; + nc->encoded_page = 0; } static inline bool page_frag_cache_is_pfmemalloc(struct page_frag_cache *nc) { - return !!nc->pfmemalloc; + return page_frag_encoded_page_pfmemalloc(nc->encoded_page); +} + +static inline unsigned int page_frag_cache_page_size(unsigned long encoded_page) +{ + return PAGE_SIZE << page_frag_encoded_page_order(encoded_page); } void page_frag_cache_drain(struct page_frag_cache *nc);
So how many of these additions are actually needed outside of the page_frag_cache.c file? I'm just wondering if we could look at moving most of these into the c file itself instead of making them accessible to all callers as I don't believe we currently have anyone looking into the size of the frag cache or anything like that and I would prefer to avoid exposing such functionality if possible. As the non-order0 allocation problem with this has pointed out people will exploit any interface exposed even if unintentionally. I would want to move the size/order logic as well as splitting out the virtual address as we shouldn't be allowing the user to look at that without going through an allocation function.