RE: [PATCH net] net: mana: Fix race of mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe and new hwc response
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Date: 2024-08-22 14:30:27
Also in:
bpf, linux-hyperv, linux-rdma, lkml, stable
-----Original Message----- From: Christophe JAILLET <redacted> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 1:34 AM To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: ast@kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org; daniel@iogearbox.net; davem@davemloft.net; Dexuan Cui [off-list ref]; edumazet@google.com; hawk@kernel.org; jesse.brandeburg@intel.com; john.fastabend@gmail.com; kuba@kernel.org; KY Srinivasan [off-list ref]; leon@kernel.org; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Long Li [off-list ref]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; olaf@aepfle.de; pabeni@redhat.com; Paul Rosswurm [off-list ref]; shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com; ssengar@linux.microsoft.com; stable@vger.kernel.org; stephen@networkplumber.org; tglx@linutronix.de; vkuznets@redhat.com; wei.liu@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mana: Fix race of mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe and new hwc response Le 21/08/2024 à 22:42, Haiyang Zhang a écrit :quoted
The mana_hwc_rx_event_handler() / mana_hwc_handle_resp() calls complete(&ctx->comp_event) before posting the wqe back. It's possible that other callers, like mana_create_txq(), start the next round of mana_hwc_send_request() before the posting of wqe. And if the HW is fast enough to respond, it can hit no_wqe error on the HW channel, then the response message is lost. The mana driver may fail to create queues and open, because of waiting for the HW response and timed out. Sample dmesg: [ 528.610840] mana 39d4:00:02.0: HWC: Request timed out! [ 528.614452] mana 39d4:00:02.0: Failed to send mana message: -110, 0x0 [ 528.618326] mana 39d4:00:02.0 enP14804s2: Failed to create WQ object:-110quoted
To fix it, move posting of rx wqe before complete(&ctx->comp_event). Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Fixes: ca9c54d2d6a5 ("net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft AzureNetwork Adapter (MANA)")quoted
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>quoted
--- .../net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c | 62 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.cquoted
index cafded2f9382..a00f915c5188 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c@@ -52,9 +52,33 @@ static int mana_hwc_verify_resp_msg(const structhwc_caller_ctx *caller_ctx,quoted
return 0; } +static int mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe(const struct hwc_wq *hwc_rxq, + struct hwc_work_request *req) +{ + struct device *dev = hwc_rxq->hwc->dev; + struct gdma_sge *sge; + int err; + + sge = &req->sge; + sge->address = (u64)req->buf_sge_addr; + sge->mem_key = hwc_rxq->msg_buf->gpa_mkey; + sge->size = req->buf_len; + + memset(&req->wqe_req, 0, sizeof(struct gdma_wqe_request)); + req->wqe_req.sgl = sge; + req->wqe_req.num_sge = 1; + req->wqe_req.client_data_unit = 0;Hi, unrelated to your patch, but this initialization is useless, it is already memset(0)'ed a few lines above. So why client_data_unit and not some other fields?
Agreed. This patch just moves the function for the bug fix. We will do code cleanups in other patches. Thanks, - Haiyang