Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2024-08-28

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: prefer strscpy over strcpy

From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Date: 2024-08-28 07:43:36
Also in: linux-hams, netfilter-devel


On 2024/8/27 20:30, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 07:35:22PM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote:
quoted
The deprecated helper strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the
destination buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond
the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors.
The safe replacement is strscpy() [1].

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
---
  net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0d0b983a6c21..f5e0a0d801fd 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -11121,7 +11121,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
  	if (!dev->ethtool)
  		goto free_all;
  
-	strcpy(dev->name, name);
+	strscpy(dev->name, name, sizeof(dev->name));
You can just do:

	strscpy(dev->name, name);

I prefer this format because it ensures that dev->name is an array and not a
pointer.  Also shorter.
ok, I'll remove the len.(Most of these are an array, not a pointer)

Thanks,
Hongbo
regards,
dan carpenter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help