Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] netlink: spec: add shaper YAML spec
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-08-14 14:22:00
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-08-14 14:22:00
On 8/13/24 19:12, Donald Hunter wrote:
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:58:33 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:quoted
quoted
It's a tree, so perhaps just stick with tree terminology, everyone is used to that. Makes sense? One way or another, this needs to be properly described in docs, all terminology. That would make things more clear, I believe.@Jakub, would you be ok with: 'inputs' -> 'leaves' 'output' -> 'node' ?I think the confusion is primarily about th parent / child. input and output should be very clear, IMO.input / output seems the most intuitive of the different terms that have been suggested.
Since a sort of agreement was reached about using root / leaf instead, and (quoting someone smarter then me) a good compromise makes every party equally unhappy, would you consider such other option? Thanks, Paolo