Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v9 00/17] Add IP-TFS mode to xfrm
From: Christian Hopps <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-08 20:06:27
Antony Antony [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Chris, On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 05:13:14PM -0400, Christian Hopps wrote:quoted
* Summary of Changes:
...
quoted
v8->v9 (8/7/2024) - factor common code from skbuff.c:__copy_skb_header into ___copy_skb_header and use in iptfs rather that copying any code. - change all BUG_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE - remove unwanted new NOSKB xfrm MIB error counter - remove unneeded copy or share choice function - ifdef CONFIG_IPV6 around IPv6 functionI noticed a build error with CONFIG_XFRM_IPTFS=m. This error also shows up in in NetDev NIPA tester. However, it kernel builds with CONFIG_XFRM_IPTFS=y
Indeed. Added the missing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(___copy_skb_header) now..
a@laya:~/git/linux (iptfs-patchset-v9-20240808)$ make CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh DESCEND objtool INSTALL libsubcmd_headers MODPOST Module.symvers ERROR: modpost: "___copy_skb_header" [net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.ko] undefined! make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:145: Module.symvers] Error 1 make[1]: *** [/home/a/git/linux/Makefile:1878: modpost] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2 NIPA tester also noticed the build error. https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/877576/13756764/build_clang/stderr I wonder why the kernel test robot hasn't caught this yet.
It just hasn't gotten there yet. :)
Also note a few minor issues with the patches, specifically for the patch ipsec-next,v9,14/17 https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/877576/13756763/build_clang/stderr
I'll fix these, they are transient warnings based on how I split the patchset. Thanks, Chris.
-antony
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 857 bytes