Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/15][pull request] ice: support devlink subfunction
From: Michal Swiatkowski <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-02 07:37:16
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 08:56:53AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 07:11:48AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:quoted
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 12:10:11AM CEST, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com wrote:quoted
Michal Swiatkowski says: Currently ice driver does not allow creating more than one networking device per physical function. The only way to have more hardware backed netdev is to use SR-IOV. Following patchset adds support for devlink port API. For each new pcisf type port, driver allocates new VSI, configures all resources needed, including dynamically MSIX vectors, program rules and registers new netdev. This series supports only one Tx/Rx queue pair per subfunction. Example commands: devlink port add pci/0000:31:00.1 flavour pcisf pfnum 1 sfnum 1000 devlink port function set pci/0000:31:00.1/1 hw_addr 00:00:00:00:03:14 devlink port function set pci/0000:31:00.1/1 state active devlink port function del pci/0000:31:00.1/1 Make the port representor and eswitch code generic to support subfunction representor type. VSI configuration is slightly different between VF and SF. It needs to be reflected in the code. --- v2: - Add more recipients v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240729223431.681842-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/ (local)I'm confused a bit. This is certainly not v2. I replied to couple versions before. There is no changelog. Hard to track changes :/You can see all changes here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240606112503.1939759-1-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com/ (local) This is pull request from Tony, no changes between it and version from iwl.Why the changelog can't be here too? It's still the same patchset, isn't it?
Correct it is the same patchset. I don't know, I though it is normal that PR is starting from v1, feels like it was always like that. Probably Tony is better person to ask about the process here.
quoted