Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 3 authors, 2024-08-06

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/15][pull request] ice: support devlink subfunction

From: Michal Swiatkowski <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-02 07:37:16

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 08:56:53AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 07:11:48AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 12:10:11AM CEST, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com wrote:
quoted
Michal Swiatkowski says:

Currently ice driver does not allow creating more than one networking
device per physical function. The only way to have more hardware backed
netdev is to use SR-IOV.

Following patchset adds support for devlink port API. For each new
pcisf type port, driver allocates new VSI, configures all resources
needed, including dynamically MSIX vectors, program rules and registers
new netdev.

This series supports only one Tx/Rx queue pair per subfunction.

Example commands:
devlink port add pci/0000:31:00.1 flavour pcisf pfnum 1 sfnum 1000
devlink port function set pci/0000:31:00.1/1 hw_addr 00:00:00:00:03:14
devlink port function set pci/0000:31:00.1/1 state active
devlink port function del pci/0000:31:00.1/1

Make the port representor and eswitch code generic to support
subfunction representor type.

VSI configuration is slightly different between VF and SF. It needs to
be reflected in the code.
---
v2:
- Add more recipients

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240729223431.681842-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/ (local)
I'm confused a bit. This is certainly not v2. I replied to couple
versions before. There is no changelog. Hard to track changes :/
You can see all changes here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240606112503.1939759-1-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com/ (local)

This is pull request from Tony, no changes between it and version from
iwl.
Why the changelog can't be here too? It's still the same patchset, isn't
it?
Correct it is the same patchset. I don't know, I though it is normal
that PR is starting from v1, feels like it was always like that.
Probably Tony is better person to ask about the process here.
quoted
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help