Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/4] net: lan743x: Migrate phylib to phylink
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2024-07-30 11:29:35
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:18:20PM +0530, Raju Lakkaraju wrote:
Ok. After change, i ran the checkpatch script. it's giving follwoing warning i.e. "CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "dn"" Is it OK ?
Assuming its referring to:
return dn != NULL;
in a function that returns a bool, I find that utterly perverse, and I
suggest in this case ignoring checkpatch.
quoted
quoted
+static int lan743x_phylink_connect(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct device_node *dn = adapter->pdev->dev.of_node; + struct net_device *dev = adapter->netdev; + struct fixed_phy_status fphy_status = { + .link = 1, + .speed = SPEED_1000, + .duplex = DUPLEX_FULL, + }; + struct phy_device *phydev; + int ret; + + if (dn) + ret = phylink_of_phy_connect(adapter->phylink, dn, 0); + + if (!dn || (ret && !lan743x_phy_handle_exists(dn))) { + phydev = phy_find_first(adapter->mdiobus); + if (!phydev) { + if (((adapter->csr.id_rev & ID_REV_ID_MASK_) == + ID_REV_ID_LAN7431_) || adapter->is_pci11x1x) { + phydev = fixed_phy_register(PHY_POLL, + &fphy_status, + NULL); + if (IS_ERR(phydev)) { + netdev_err(dev, "No PHY/fixed_PHY found\n"); + return PTR_ERR(phydev); + }Eww. Given that phylink has its own internal fixed-PHY support, can we not find some way to avoid the legacy fixed-PHY usage here?Yes. I agree with you. This is very much valid suggestion. Andrew also gave same suggestion. Currently we don't have Device Tree support for LAN743X driver. For SFP support, I create the software-node an passing the paramters there. I don't have fixed-PHY hardware setup currently. I would like to take this as action item to fix it after SFP support commits.
Note that SFP shouldn't be using a fixed-phy at all. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!