Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 6 authors, 2024-09-09

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Introduce multi queue Rx

From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-07-08 19:42:14
Also in: linux-omap, lkml


On 06/07/2024 04:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:51:32 +0300 Roger Quadros wrote:
quoted
 
-	if (queue >= AM65_CPSW_MAX_TX_QUEUES)
+	if (queue >= AM65_CPSW_MAX_TX_QUEUES &&
+	    queue >= AM65_CPSW_MAX_RX_QUEUES)
 		return -EINVAL;
both MAXes are 8, the else conditions below are dead code
Same for set
yes. Maybe I should just use one define for both? e.g. AM65_CPSW_MAX_QUEUES.
quoted
-	tx_chn = &common->tx_chns[queue];
+	if (queue < AM65_CPSW_MAX_TX_QUEUES) {
+		tx_chn = &common->tx_chns[queue];
+		coal->tx_coalesce_usecs = tx_chn->tx_pace_timeout / 1000;
+	} else {
+		coal->tx_coalesce_usecs = ~0;
+	}
 
-	coal->tx_coalesce_usecs = tx_chn->tx_pace_timeout / 1000;
+	if (queue < AM65_CPSW_MAX_RX_QUEUES) {
+		rx_flow = &common->rx_chns.flows[queue];
+		coal->rx_coalesce_usecs = rx_flow->rx_pace_timeout / 1000;
+	} else {
+		coal->rx_coalesce_usecs = ~0;
+	}
+	for (flow_idx = 0; flow_idx < common->rx_ch_num_flows; flow_idx++) {
+		flow = &rx_chn->flows[flow_idx];
+		for (i = 0; i < AM65_CPSW_MAX_RX_DESC; i++) {
+			page = page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(flow->page_pool);
+			if (!page) {
+				dev_err(common->dev, "cannot allocate page in flow %d\n",
+					flow_idx);
+				ret = -ENOMEM;
+				if (i)
+					goto fail_rx;
 
-			return ret;
-		}
-		rx_chn->pages[i] = page;
+				return ret;

the direct returns now that it's a double-nested loop seem questionable,
don't you have to goto fail_rx?
Good catch. I should just drop the "if (i)" and goto fail_rx regardless.

-- 
cheers,
-roger
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help