On Sat, 2024-07-06 at 00:00 +0200, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
I think it might read a bit better if we model it like the hairpin check
above. I.e. (special_mode || regular_condition)
It's not really that the state is forwarding when mst is enabled, we
simply ignore the port-global state in that case.
quoted
- p->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING && br_allowed_egress(vg, skb) &&
+ state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING && br_allowed_egress(vg, skb) &&
so something like:
...
(br_mst_is_enabled(p->br) || p->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) &&
br_allowed_egress(vg, skb) && nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress(p, skb) &&
...
Yes you're right, that's much clearer. I'll go with that.