Hello,

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:

On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:

quoted

Hello Andy!
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it
via Arnd branch.

'receive'

quoted

Unfortunately, CLK subsystem suddenly went silent on clk portion
of
series V2 reroll,
tried to ping them for about a month but no luck.

Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v2-1-adcd68c13753@maquefel.me (local)

Some changes since last version (v9) - see "Changes in v10",
mostly
cosmetic.

...

quoted

Patches should be formated with '--histogram'

'formatted'

...

quoted

Changes in v10:

Reordered SoB tags to make sure they appear before Rb and Acked
tags.

This is not required. The importance is only the order of SoBs
themselves. If they are interleaved with other tags, it's fine.

Ah - ok. Just saw someone was complaining about b4 reordering them. 

quoted

...


Hopefully to see this series being eventually applied soon.
Arnd? (Do we have all necessary subsystem maintainers' tags, btw?)

As i see from my perspective only three left:

Clk subsystem:

- clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx

DMA subsystem (but the only request from Vinod, as far as i remember,
was fixing commits titles):

- dmaengine: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
- dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code

Beside that tags missing on platform code removal (which can be Acked
by Arnd himself i believe) and dtsi/dts files (same ?).

Vinod acked the above two patches:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkIp8bOcZK3yVKP@matsya/ (local)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkImp8BtTdxl7O3@matsya/ (local)

so only:

- clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617-ep93xx-v10-3-662e640ed811@maquefel.me/ (local)

left.

Hope Stephen will find some time for this one.

As we're approaching the merge window and this is still unclear, I
applied the pwm bits (i.e. patches 12, 13). If I understand correctly,
patch 33 isn't suitable for application yet as it has a dependency on
pinctrl changes in that series.

(side note: Your patches are signed, but that doesn't bring any benefit
if the receivers don't have your key. I didn't find it neither on
keys.openpgp.org nor in the kernel pgp key collection.)

Best regards
Uwe