Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 9 authors, 2024-07-24

Re: [PATCH net-next v15 03/14] netdev: support binding dma-buf to netdevice

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-07-03 01:09:12
Also in: bpf, dri-devel, linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-trace-kernel, lkml, sparclinux

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:32:40 +0000 Mina Almasry wrote:
+/* Protected by rtnl_lock() */
+static DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
+
+void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding)
+{
+	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
+	unsigned long xa_idx;
+	unsigned int rxq_idx;
+
+	if (!binding)
+		return;
nit: I don't see how it can happen, no defensive programming, please
+	if (binding->list.next)
+		list_del(&binding->list);
+
+	xa_for_each(&binding->bound_rxq_list, xa_idx, rxq) {
nit: s/bound_rxq_list/bound_rxqs/ ? it's not a list
+		if (rxq->mp_params.mp_priv == binding) {
+			/* We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding
+			 * dma-buf, so we can't race with another thread that
+			 * is also modifying this value. However, the page_pool
+			 * may read this config while it's creating its
+			 * rx-queues. WRITE_ONCE() here to match the
+			 * READ_ONCE() in the page_pool.
+			 */
+			WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, NULL);
Is this really sufficient in terms of locking? @binding is not
RCU-protected and neither is the reader guaranteed to be in 
an RCU critical section. Actually the "reader" tries to take a ref 
and use this struct so it's not even a pure reader.

Let's add a lock or use one of the existing locks

Or, perhaps time to add a mutex to struct net_device
+			rxq_idx = get_netdev_rx_queue_index(rxq);
+
+			netdev_rx_queue_restart(binding->dev, rxq_idx);
+		}
+	}
+
+	xa_erase(&net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, binding->id);
+
+	net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_put(binding);
+}
+
+int net_devmem_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
+				    struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding)
+{
+	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
+	u32 xa_idx;
+	int err;
+
+	if (rxq_idx >= dev->num_rx_queues)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx);
+	if (rxq->mp_params.mp_priv)
+		return -EEXIST;
Makes me wonder - do we need an API to unbind or we assume
application will only have one binding per socket and close 
it every time? I guess that's fine for future extension.
+	err = xa_alloc(&binding->bound_rxq_list, &xa_idx, rxq, xa_limit_32b,
+		       GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	/* We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding dma-buf, so we can't
+	 * race with another thread that is also modifying this value. However,
+	 * the driver may read this config while it's creating its * rx-queues.
+	 * WRITE_ONCE() here to match the READ_ONCE() in the driver.
+	 */
+	WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, binding);
+
+	err = netdev_rx_queue_restart(dev, rxq_idx);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_xa_erase;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_xa_erase:
+	WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, NULL);
+	xa_erase(&binding->bound_rxq_list, xa_idx);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+int net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
+			   struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding **out)
+{
+	struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
+	static u32 id_alloc_next;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
+	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
+	unsigned int sg_idx, i;
+	unsigned long virtual;
+	int err;
+
+	dmabuf = dma_buf_get(dmabuf_fd);
+	if (IS_ERR(dmabuf))
+		return -EBADFD;
nit: I think error pointers are nicer than **out parameters :(
     you can ERR_CAST() all the DMABUF errors
+	binding = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*binding), GFP_KERNEL,
+			       dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
+	if (!binding) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_put_dmabuf;
+	}
+
+	binding->dev = dev;
+
+	err = xa_alloc_cyclic(&net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, &binding->id,
+			      binding, xa_limit_32b, &id_alloc_next,
+			      GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto err_free_binding;
+
+	xa_init_flags(&binding->bound_rxq_list, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
+
+	refcount_set(&binding->ref, 1);
+
+	binding->dmabuf = dmabuf;
+
+	binding->attachment = dma_buf_attach(binding->dmabuf, dev->dev.parent);
+	if (IS_ERR(binding->attachment)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(binding->attachment);
+		goto err_free_id;
+	}
-/* Stub */
 int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	return 0;
+	struct nlattr *tb[ARRAY_SIZE(netdev_queue_dmabuf_nl_policy)];
+	struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *out_binding;
+	struct list_head *sock_binding_list;
+	u32 ifindex, dmabuf_fd, rxq_idx;
+	struct net_device *netdev;
+	struct sk_buff *rsp;
+	struct nlattr *attr;
+	int rem, err = 0;
+	void *hdr;
+
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX) ||
+	    GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_DMABUF_FD) ||
+	    GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_QUEUES))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX]);
+	dmabuf_fd = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_DMABUF_FD]);
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+
+	netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+	if (!netdev) {
 || !netif_device_present(netdev)
+		err = -ENODEV;
+		goto err_unlock;
+	}
+
+	err = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, dmabuf_fd, &out_binding);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_unlock;
+
+	nla_for_each_attr(attr, genlmsg_data(info->genlhdr),
+			  genlmsg_len(info->genlhdr), rem) {
+
+		if (nla_type(attr) != NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_QUEUES)
+			continue;
nit: nla_for_each_attr_type()
+		err = nla_parse_nested(
+			tb, ARRAY_SIZE(netdev_queue_dmabuf_nl_policy) - 1, attr,
+			netdev_queue_dmabuf_nl_policy, info->extack);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto err_unbind;
+
+		rxq_idx = nla_get_u32(tb[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_DMABUF_IDX]);
+
+		err = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(netdev, rxq_idx,
+						      out_binding);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_unbind;
+	}
+
+	sock_binding_list = genl_sk_priv_get(&netdev_nl_family,
+					     NETLINK_CB(skb).sk);
+	if (IS_ERR(sock_binding_list)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(sock_binding_list);
+		goto err_unbind;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&out_binding->list, sock_binding_list);
+
+	rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rsp) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_unbind;
+	}
+
+	hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
+	if (!hdr) {
+		err = -EMSGSIZE;
+		goto err_genlmsg_free;
+	}
I'd move genl_sk_priv_get(), genlmsg_new() and genlmsg_iput() before we
take rtnl_lock(), but I admit it's a bit late for this sort of
feedback.. :)
+	nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_DMABUF_ID, out_binding->id);
+	genlmsg_end(rsp, hdr);
+
+	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	return genlmsg_reply(rsp, info);
+
+err_genlmsg_free:
+	nlmsg_free(rsp);
+err_unbind:
+	net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(out_binding);
+err_unlock:
+	rtnl_unlock();
+	return err;
 }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help