Re: [PATCH net-next v7 01/15] mm: page_frag: add a test module for page_frag
From: Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
Date: 2024-06-19 12:57:54
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 2024/6/18 22:45, wang wei wrote:
quoted
+ +static struct objpool_head ptr_pool; +static int nr_objs = 512; +static atomic_t nthreads; +static struct completion wait; +static struct page_frag_cache test_frag; + +static int nr_test = 5120000; +module_param(nr_test, int, 0600);"S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR" is better than "0600".
Yes, it is better. But as we do the testing in module init, it seems we could just use module_param(nr_test, int, 0) instead.
quoted
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(nr_test, "number of iterations to test"); + +static bool test_align; +module_param(test_align, bool, 0600); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_align, "use align API for testing"); + +static int test_alloc_len = 2048; +module_param(test_alloc_len, int, 0600); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_alloc_len, "alloc len for testing"); + +static int test_push_cpu; +module_param(test_push_cpu, int, 0600); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_push_cpu, "test cpu for pushing fragment"); + +static int test_pop_cpu; +module_param(test_pop_cpu, int, 0600); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_pop_cpu, "test cpu for popping fragment"); + +static int page_frag_pop_thread(void *arg) +{ + struct objpool_head *pool = arg; + int nr = nr_test; + + pr_info("page_frag pop test thread begins on cpu %d\n", + smp_processor_id()); + + while (nr > 0) { + void *obj = objpool_pop(pool); + + if (obj) { + nr--; + page_frag_free(obj); + } else { + cond_resched(); + } + } + + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&nthreads)) + complete(&wait); + + pr_info("page_frag pop test thread exits on cpu %d\n", + smp_processor_id()); + + return 0; +} + +static int page_frag_push_thread(void *arg) +{ + struct objpool_head *pool = arg; + int nr = nr_test; + + pr_info("page_frag push test thread begins on cpu %d\n", + smp_processor_id()); + + while (nr > 0) { + void *va; + int ret; + + if (test_align) + va = page_frag_alloc_align(&test_frag, test_alloc_len, + GFP_KERNEL, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);Every page fragment max size is PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, hence the value of test_alloc_len needs to be checked.
yes, that needs to be checked. limit the test_alloc_len to PGAE_SIZE seems better, as we may fail back to order 0 page.