Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 1 author, 2024-06-19
STALE728d
Revisions (9)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 [diff vs current]
  6. v6 [diff vs current]
  7. v7 [diff vs current]
  8. v8 current
  9. v9 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v8 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad.

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2024-06-19 07:23:28
Also in: bpf, lkml
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [networking] (tcx & tc bpf, sock_addr), networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

bpf_scratchpad is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.

Add a local_lock_t to the data structure and use local_lock_nested_bh()
for locking. This change adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter
the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Hao Luo <redacted>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <redacted>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index ba1a739a9bedc..fbcfd563dccfd 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -1658,9 +1658,12 @@ struct bpf_scratchpad {
 		__be32 diff[MAX_BPF_STACK / sizeof(__be32)];
 		u8     buff[MAX_BPF_STACK];
 	};
+	local_lock_t	bh_lock;
 };
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_scratchpad, bpf_sp);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_scratchpad, bpf_sp) = {
+	.bh_lock	= INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
 
 static inline int __bpf_try_make_writable(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					  unsigned int write_len)
@@ -2016,6 +2019,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
 	struct bpf_scratchpad *sp = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_sp);
 	u32 diff_size = from_size + to_size;
 	int i, j = 0;
+	__wsum ret;
 
 	/* This is quite flexible, some examples:
 	 *
@@ -2029,12 +2033,15 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
 		     diff_size > sizeof(sp->diff)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	local_lock_nested_bh(&bpf_sp.bh_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < from_size / sizeof(__be32); i++, j++)
 		sp->diff[j] = ~from[i];
 	for (i = 0; i <   to_size / sizeof(__be32); i++, j++)
 		sp->diff[j] = to[i];
 
-	return csum_partial(sp->diff, diff_size, seed);
+	ret = csum_partial(sp->diff, diff_size, seed);
+	local_unlock_nested_bh(&bpf_sp.bh_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_csum_diff_proto = {
-- 
2.45.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help