Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2024-06-19
STALE725d
Revisions (9)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 [diff vs current]
  6. v6 [diff vs current]
  7. v7 current
  8. v8 [diff vs current]
  9. v9 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v7 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF.

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2024-06-18 07:25:38
Also in: bpf, lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

There is no need to explicitly disable migration if bottom halves are
also disabled. Disabling BH implies disabling migration.

Remove migrate_disable() and rely solely on disabling BH to remain on
the same CPU.

Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
index 4a0797f0a154b..a94943681e5aa 100644
--- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
@@ -40,10 +40,9 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	/* Migration disable and BH disable are needed to protect per-cpu
-	 * redirect_info between BPF prog and skb_do_redirect().
+	/* Disabling BH is needed to protect per-CPU bpf_redirect_info between
+	 * BPF prog and skb_do_redirect().
 	 */
-	migrate_disable();
 	local_bh_disable();
 	bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
 	ret = bpf_prog_run_save_cb(lwt->prog, skb);
@@ -78,7 +77,6 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
 	}
 
 	local_bh_enable();
-	migrate_enable();
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.45.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help