On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 04:02:28PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:14:56PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

quoted

+	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL]); idx++) {
+		char *short_size, *cache_name;
+		unsigned int cache_useroffset, cache_usersize;
+		unsigned int size;
+
+		if (!kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL][idx])
+			continue;
+
+		size = kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL][idx]->object_size;
+		if (!size)
+			continue;
+
+		short_size = strchr(kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL][idx]->name, '-');
+		if (WARN_ON(!short_size))
+			goto fail;
+
+		cache_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", name, short_size + 1);
+		if (WARN_ON(!cache_name))
+			goto fail;
+
+		if (useroffset >= size) {
+			cache_useroffset = 0;
+			cache_usersize = 0;
+		} else {
+			cache_useroffset = useroffset;
+			cache_usersize = min(size - cache_useroffset, usersize);
+		}
+		(*b)[idx] = kmem_cache_create_usercopy(cache_name, size,
+					align, flags, cache_useroffset,
+					cache_usersize, ctor);
+		kfree(cache_name);
+		if (WARN_ON(!(*b)[idx]))
+			goto fail;
+	}
+
+	return b;
+
+fail:
+	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_NORMAL]); idx++) {
+		if ((*b)[idx])
+			kmem_cache_destroy((*b)[idx]);

nit: I don't think it is necessary to guard this with a check for NULL.

Isn't it? What if a kasprintf() fails halfway through the loop?

Tycho