Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb

[PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: refactor skb_cmp_decrypted() checks · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2024-05-30
[PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: wrap mptcp and decrypted checks into tcp_skb_can_collapse_rx() · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2024-05-30
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: wrap mptcp and decrypted checks into tcp_skb_can_collapse_rx() · Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: wrap mptcp and decrypted checks into tcp_skb_can_collapse_rx() · Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: wrap mptcp and decrypted checks into tcp_skb_can_collapse_rx() · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2024-05-31
[PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2024-05-30
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb · Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2024-06-01
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: add a helper for setting EOR on tail skb · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2024-06-02
[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: skb: add compatibility warnings to skb_shift() · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2024-05-30
Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: skb: add compatibility warnings to skb_shift() · Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: skb: add compatibility warnings to skb_shift() · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2024-05-31
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: refactor skb_cmp_decrypted() checks · patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org · 2024-06-04

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-06-02 01:35:06
Also in: mptcp

Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Fri, 31 May 2024 09:41:30 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:

quoted

+static inline void tcp_write_collapse_fence(struct sock *sk)
+{

const struct ptr?

Maybe just me, but feels kinda weird for the sole input to be const
if the function does modify the object it operates on.

Ok. I can see that.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help