Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-05-07 13:27:51
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On 07/05/2024 14.36, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2024-05-06 16:09:47 [-0700], Alexei Starovoitov wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
On PREEMPT_RT the pointer to bpf_net_context is saved task's task_struct. On non-PREEMPT_RT builds the pointer saved in a per-CPU variable (which is always NODE-local memory). Using always the bpf_net_context approach has the advantage that there is almost zero differences between PREEMPT_RT and non-PREEMPT_RT builds.Did you ever manage to get any performance data to see if this has an impact? [...]quoted
+static inline struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx_get(void) +{ + struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = this_cpu_read(bpf_net_context); + + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_net_ctx);If we have this WARN...
When asking for change anyhow... XDP redirect is an extreme fast-path. Adding an WARN macro cause adding an 'ud2' instruction that cause CPU instruction-cache to stop pre-fetching. For this reason we in include/net/xdp.h have #define XDP_WARN and function xdp_warn() that lives in net/core/xdp.c. See how it is used in xdp_update_frame_from_buff(). Described in https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/34cc0b338a61 - 34cc0b338a61 ("xdp: Xdp_frame add member frame_sz and handle in convert_to_xdp_frame")
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static inline struct bpf_redirect_info *bpf_net_ctx_get_ri(void) +{ + struct bpf_net_context *bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_get(); + + if (!bpf_net_ctx) + return NULL;... do we really need all the NULL checks?Indeed. Let's drop all NULL checks, since they definitely add overhead. I'd also remove ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and converge on single implementation: static inline struct bpf_net_context * bpf_net_ctx_get(void) { return current->bpf_net_context; }Okay, let me do that then.
I need/want to echo Toke's request to benchmark these changes. --Jesper