Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2024-05-06

Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

From: Easwar Hariharan <hidden>
Date: 2024-05-06 15:54:48
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-xe, linux-fbdev, linux-i2c, linux-media, lkml, nouveau

On 5/3/2024 3:13 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:09 +0000 Easwar Hariharan wrote:
quoted
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the specification.

Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
FWIW we're assuming someone (Wolfram?) will take all of these,
instead of area maintainers picking them individually.
Please let us know if that's incorrect.
I think, based on the trend in the v2 conversation[1], that's correct. If maintainers of
other areas disagree, please chime in.

Thanks,
Easwar

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240503181333.2336999-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help