Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: drop unused argument set_ownership()::table

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:56:54PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:

On 2024-03-15 16:41:34+0100, Joel Granados wrote:

quoted

Hey Thomas

Did you forget to compile? I'm seeing the following error when I
compile:

Welp...

quoted

  ...
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c: In function ‘proc_sys_make_inode’:
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:483:43: error: passing argument 2 of ‘root->set_ownership’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
    483 |                 root->set_ownership(head, table, &inode->i_uid, &inode->i_gid);
        |                                           ^~~~~
        |                                           |
        |                                           struct ctl_table *
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:483:43: note: expected ‘kuid_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct ctl_table *’
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:483:50: error: passing argument 3 of ‘root->set_ownership’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
    483 |                 root->set_ownership(head, table, &inode->i_uid, &inode->i_gid);
        |                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                                  |
        |                                                  kuid_t *
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:483:50: note: expected ‘kgid_t *’ but argument is of type ‘kuid_t *’
  ../fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:483:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘root->set_ownership’
    483 |                 root->set_ownership(head, table, &inode->i_uid, &inode->i_gid);
        |                 ^~~~
  cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
  make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/proc/proc_sysctl.o] Error 1
    CC      fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.o
  make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  ...

I'm guessing its just a matter of removing the table arg from
proc_sys_make_inode?

Yes, for this error it's correct.

There are also new implementors of the set_ownership callback in ipc/
which need to be adapted.

I'll send a new revision.

Thx. Not sure what your using as a base, but I suggest you use
linux-next so you get al the stuff going into the rc.

best

-- 

Joel Granados