Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2024-03-29

Re: [PATCH net] ax25: fix use-after-free bugs caused by ax25_ds_del_timer

From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-03-27 19:10:29
Also in: linux-hams, lkml

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:25:42PM +0800, Duoming Zhou wrote:
When the ax25 device is detaching, the ax25_dev_device_down()
calls ax25_ds_del_timer() to cleanup the slave_timer. When
the timer handler is running, the ax25_ds_del_timer() that
calls del_timer() in it will return directly. As a result,
the use-after-free bugs could happen, one of the scenarios
is shown below:

      (Thread 1)          |      (Thread 2)
                          | ax25_ds_timeout()
ax25_dev_device_down()    |
  ax25_ds_del_timer()     |
    del_timer()           |
  ax25_dev_put() //FREE   |
                          |  ax25_dev-> //USE

In order to mitigate bugs, when the device is detaching, use
timer_shutdown_sync() to stop the timer.
FWIIW, in my reading of things there is another failure mode whereby
ax25_ds_timeout may rearm the timer after the call to del_timer() but
before the call to ax25_dev_put().
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <redacted>
---
 net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c
index c4f8adbf814..5624c0d174c 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c
@@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ void ax25_ds_setup_timer(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
 
 void ax25_ds_del_timer(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
 {
-	if (ax25_dev)
+	if (!ax25_dev)
+		return;
+
+	if (!ax25_dev->device_up)
+		timer_shutdown_sync(&ax25_dev->dama.slave_timer);
+	else
 		del_timer(&ax25_dev->dama.slave_timer);
 }
I think that a) it is always correct to call timer_shutdown_sync,
and b) ax25_dev->device_up is always true. So a call to
timer_shutdown_sync can simply replace the call to del_timer.

Also, not strictly related, I think ax25_dev cannot be NULL,
so that check could be dropped. But perhaps that is better left alone.


Zooming out a bit, has removal of ax25 been considered.
I didn't check the logs thoroughly, but I'm not convinced it's been
maintained - other than clean-ups and by-inspection bug fixes - since git
history began.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help