Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 4 authors, 2024-02-27

Re: [PATCH net-next resend 2/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,asp-v2.0: Add asp-v2.2

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-27 06:55:29
Also in: linux-devicetree

On 26/02/2024 20:42, Justin Chen wrote:

On 2/24/24 2:22 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 23/02/2024 23:24, Justin Chen wrote:
quoted
Add support for ASP 2.2.

Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
index 75d8138298fb..5a345f03de17 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ description: Broadcom Ethernet controller first introduced with 72165
  properties:
    compatible:
      oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - brcm,bcm74165-asp
+          - const: brcm,asp-v2.2
        - items:
            - enum:
                - brcm,bcm74165-asp
Hm, this confuses me: why do you have same SoC with three different
versions of the same block?
bcm72165 -> asp-v2.0
bcm74165 -> asp-v2.1
Are two different SoCs.
Ah, right, existing bindings has two SoCs.
The entry I just added is
bcm74165 -> asp-v2.2
This is a SoC minor revision. Maybe it should bcm74165b0-asp instead? 
Not sure what the protocol is.
So still the confusion - same SoC with different IP blocks. That's
totally opposite of what we expect: same version of IP block used in
multiple SoCs.



Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help