Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2024-03-14

Re: [FYI][PATCH] tracing/treewide: Remove second parameter of __assign_str()

From: Jeff Johnson <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-23 18:33:59
Also in: amd-gfx, ath11k, ath12k, bpf, dri-devel, intel-gfx, intel-xe, io-uring, kvm, linux-arm-msm, linux-bcachefs, linux-block, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-cxl, linux-edac, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-hwmon, linux-hyperv, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-nfs, linux-pm, linux-rdma, linux-s390, linux-sound, linux-tegra, linux-trace-kernel, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-xfs, linuxppc-dev, lkml, ocfs2-devel, selinux, virtualization

On 2/23/2024 9:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

[
   This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
   the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping
   to keep the conflicts that it will cause to a minimum.
]

With the rework of how the __string() handles dynamic strings where it
saves off the source string in field in the helper structure[1], the
assignment of that value to the trace event field is stored in the helper
value and does not need to be passed in again.
Just curious if this could be done piecemeal by first changing the
macros to be variadic macros which allows you to ignore the extra
argument. The callers could then be modified in their separate trees.
And then once all the callers have be merged, the macros could be
changed to no longer be variadic.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help