Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2024-02-14

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec_restart() in resume path

From: John Ernberg <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-14 08:27:11
Also in: lkml

On 2/14/24 03:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:50:30 +0000 John Ernberg wrote:
quoted
Tested on 6.1 kernel and forward ported. I discovered this when we
upgraded from 5.10 to 6.1, but the resume path in the FEC driver has had
this imbalance since at least 2009.

This is also why I target the -next tree, I can't identify a proper commit
to blame with a Fixes. Let me know if this should be the net tree anyway.
I thought you bisected it to one or two specific changes?
I'd put those down as Fixes tags and target net.
Hi Jakub,

You are correct, we thought so too at [1], but bisection is really hard 
because we need a whole bunch of patches on top to even boot the system 
(imx8qxp specific stuff in the NXP vendor tree that's difficult to 
rebase), we left it a bit open ended.

Over the course of the weekend I lost all confidence in my bisection 
after being confident for 4-5 days, because the more I thought about it 
the less it made sense for that commit to be the culprit.

I should probably have both followed up on that mail with that, and been 
clearer here. I apologize for failing that.

Best regards // John Ernberg

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1f45bdbe-eab1-4e59-8f24-add177590d27@actia.se/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help