Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec_restart() in resume path
From: John Ernberg <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-14 08:27:11
Also in:
lkml
On 2/14/24 03:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:50:30 +0000 John Ernberg wrote:quoted
Tested on 6.1 kernel and forward ported. I discovered this when we upgraded from 5.10 to 6.1, but the resume path in the FEC driver has had this imbalance since at least 2009. This is also why I target the -next tree, I can't identify a proper commit to blame with a Fixes. Let me know if this should be the net tree anyway.I thought you bisected it to one or two specific changes? I'd put those down as Fixes tags and target net.
Hi Jakub, You are correct, we thought so too at [1], but bisection is really hard because we need a whole bunch of patches on top to even boot the system (imx8qxp specific stuff in the NXP vendor tree that's difficult to rebase), we left it a bit open ended. Over the course of the weekend I lost all confidence in my bisection after being confident for 4-5 days, because the more I thought about it the less it made sense for that commit to be the culprit. I should probably have both followed up on that mail with that, and been clearer here. I apologize for failing that. Best regards // John Ernberg [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1f45bdbe-eab1-4e59-8f24-add177590d27@actia.se/ (local)