Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 3 authors, 2024-02-14

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 07/14] page_pool: devmem support

From: Mina Almasry <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-13 21:11:42
Also in: bpf, dri-devel, linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-trace-kernel, lkml, sparclinux

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:28 AM Pavel Begunkov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 12/18/23 02:40, Mina Almasry wrote:
quoted
Convert netmem to be a union of struct page and struct netmem. Overload
the LSB of struct netmem* to indicate that it's a net_iov, otherwise
it's a page.

Currently these entries in struct page are rented by the page_pool and
used exclusively by the net stack:

struct {
      unsigned long pp_magic;
      struct page_pool *pp;
      unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
      unsigned long dma_addr;
      atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
};

Mirror these (and only these) entries into struct net_iov and implement
netmem helpers that can access these common fields regardless of
whether the underlying type is page or net_iov.
Implement checks for net_iov in netmem helpers which delegate to mm
APIs, to ensure net_iov are never passed to the mm stack.

Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <redacted>

---

RFCv5:
- Use netmem instead of page* with LSB set.
- Use pp_ref_count for refcounting net_iov.
- Removed many of the custom checks for netmem.

v1:
- Disable fragmentation support for iov properly.
- fix napi_pp_put_page() path (Yunsheng).
- Use pp_frag_count for devmem refcounting.

---
  include/net/netmem.h            | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  include/net/page_pool/helpers.h |  25 +++---
  net/core/page_pool.c            |  26 +++---
  net/core/skbuff.c               |   9 +-
  4 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netmem.h b/include/net/netmem.h
index 31f338f19da0..7557aecc0f78 100644
--- a/include/net/netmem.h
+++ b/include/net/netmem.h
@@ -12,11 +12,47 @@

  /* net_iov */

+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(page_pool_mem_providers);
+
+/*  We overload the LSB of the struct page pointer to indicate whether it's
+ *  a page or net_iov.
+ */
+#define NET_IOV 0x01UL
+
  struct net_iov {
+     unsigned long __unused_padding;
+     unsigned long pp_magic;
+     struct page_pool *pp;
      struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *owner;
      unsigned long dma_addr;
+     atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
  };
I wonder if it would be better to extract a common sub-struct
used in struct page, struct_group_tagged can help to avoid
touching old code:

struct page {
        unsigned long flags;
        union {
                ...
                struct_group_tagged(<struct_name>, ...,
                        /**
                         * @pp_magic: magic value to avoid recycling non
                         * page_pool allocated pages.
                         */
                        unsigned long pp_magic;
                        struct page_pool *pp;
                        unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
                        unsigned long dma_addr;
                        atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
                );
        };
}

struct net_iov {
        unsigned long pad;
        struct <struct_name> p;
};


A bit of a churn with the padding and nesting net_iov but looks
sturdier. No duplication, and you can just check positions of the
structure instead of per-field NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET, which you
have to not forget to update e.g. when adding a new field. Also,
Yes, this is nicer. If possible I'll punt it to a minor cleanup as a
follow up change. Logistically I think if this series need-not touch
code outside of net/, that's better.
with the change __netmem_clear_lsb can return a pointer to that
structure, casting struct net_iov when it's a page is a bit iffy.

And the next question would be whether it'd be a good idea to encode
iov vs page not by setting a bit but via one of the fields in the
structure, maybe pp_magic.
I will push back against this, for 2 reasons:

1. I think pp_magic's first 2 bits (and maybe more) are used by mm
code and thus I think extending usage of pp_magic in this series is a
bit iffy and I would like to avoid it. I just don't want to touch the
semantics of struct page if I don't have to.
2. I think this will be a measurable perf regression. Currently we can
tell if a pointer is a page or net_iov without dereferencing the
pointer and dirtying the cache-line. This will cause us to possibly
dereference the pointer in areas where we don't need to. I think I had
an earlier version of this code that required a dereference to tell if
a page was devmem and Eric pointed to me it was a perf regression.

I also don't see any upside of using pp_magic, other than making the
code slightly more readable, maybe.
With that said I'm a bit concerned about the net_iov size. If each
represents 4096 bytes and you're registering 10MB, then you need
30 pages worth of memory just for the iov array. Makes kvmalloc
a must even for relatively small sizes.
This I think is an age-old challenge with pages. 1.6% of the machine's
memory is 'wasted' on every machine because a struct page needs to be
allocated for each PAGE_SIZE region. We're running into the same issue
here where if we want to refer to PAGE_SIZE regions of memory we need
to allocate some reference to it. Note that net_iov can be relatively
easily extended to support N order pages. Also note that in the devmem
TCP use case it's not really an issue; the minor increase in mem
utilization is more than offset by the saving in memory bw as compared
to using host memory as a bounce buffer. All in all I vote this is
something that can be tuned or improved in the future if someone finds
the extra memory usage a hurdle to using devmem TCP or this net_iov
infra.
And the final bit, I don't believe the overlay is necessary in
this series. Optimisations are great, but this one is a bit more on
the controversial side. Unless I missed something and it does make
things easier, it might make sense to do it separately later.
I completely agree, the overlay is not necessary. I implemented the
overlay in response to Yunsheng's  strong requests for more 'unified'
processing between page and devmem. This is the most unification I can
do IMO without violating the requirements from Jason. I'm prepared to
remove the overlay if it turns out controversial, but so far I haven't
seen any complaints. Jason, please do take a look if you have not
already.
quoted
+/* These fields in struct page are used by the page_pool and net stack:
+ *
+ *   struct {
+ *           unsigned long pp_magic;
+ *           struct page_pool *pp;
+ *           unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
+ *           unsigned long dma_addr;
+ *           atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
+ *   };
+ *
+ * We mirror the page_pool fields here so the page_pool can access these fields
+ * without worrying whether the underlying fields belong to a page or net_iov.
+ *
+ * The non-net stack fields of struct page are private to the mm stack and must
+ * never be mirrored to net_iov.
+ */
+#define NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET(pg, iov)             \
+     static_assert(offsetof(struct page, pg) == \
+                   offsetof(struct net_iov, iov))
+NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp_magic, pp_magic);
+NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp, pp);
+NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET(dma_addr, dma_addr);
+NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp_ref_count, pp_ref_count);
+#undef NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET
+
  static inline struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *
  net_iov_owner(const struct net_iov *niov)
  {
@@ -47,19 +83,25 @@ net_iov_binding(const struct net_iov *niov)
  struct netmem {
      union {
              struct page page;
-
-             /* Stub to prevent compiler implicitly converting from page*
-              * to netmem_t* and vice versa.
-              *
-              * Other memory type(s) net stack would like to support
-              * can be added to this union.
-              */
-             void *addr;
+             struct net_iov niov;
      };
  };
...

--
Pavel Begunkov


--
Thanks,
Mina
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help