Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: fix unaligned access in ice_create_lag_recipe
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: 2024-02-02 13:03:04
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 14:00:03 +0100
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:quoted
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:39:28 +0100quoted
From: Michal Schmidt <redacted> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 19:40:17 +0100quoted
On 1/31/24 17:59, Alexander Lobakin wrote:quoted
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:17:44 +0100quoted
Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:58:23PM CET, mschmidt@redhat.com wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c index 2a25323105e5..d4848f6fe919 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c@@ -1829,9 +1829,7 @@ static int ice_create_lag_recipe(struct ice_hw*hw, u16 *rid, new_rcp->content.act_ctrl_fwd_priority = prio; new_rcp->content.rid = *rid | ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ID_IS_ROOT; new_rcp->recipe_indx = *rid; - bitmap_zero((unsigned long *)new_rcp->recipe_bitmap, - ICE_MAX_NUM_RECIPES); - set_bit(*rid, (unsigned long *)new_rcp->recipe_bitmap); + put_unaligned_le64(BIT_ULL(*rid), new_rcp->recipe_bitmap);Looks like there might be another incorrect bitmap usage for this in ice_add_sw_recipe(). Care to fix it there as well?Those are already fixed in one switchdev series and will be sent to IWL soon. I believe this patch would also make no sense after it's sent.Hi Alexander, When will the series be sent? The bug causes a kernel panic. Will the series target net.git?The global fix is here: [0] It's targeting net-next. I don't know what the best way here would be. Target net instead or pick your fix to net and then fix it properly in net-next?Sorry, forgot to paste the link :clownface:IMHO 1/2 should go to net. Then you would have to wait for it to got accepted and get merged to -next and then you come back with 2/2. You know the deal.
Agree! Hi Steve, Could you please send the first patch from your series to net instead of net-next? (and add "Fixes:" tag with the blamed commit)
quoted
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20240130025146.30265-2-steven.zou@intel.com (local) Thanks, Olek
Thanks, Olek