Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: Document each netlink family
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: 2024-01-30 17:29:26
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 05:23:36PM +0100, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 30/01/2024 17:06, Breno Leitao wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:22:08AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:quoted
Jani Nikula [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Breno Leitao [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This is a simple script that parses the Netlink YAML spec files (Documentation/netlink/specs/), and generates RST files to be rendered in the Network -> Netlink Specification documentation page.First of all, my boilerplate complaint: All extra processing for Sphinx should really be done using Sphinx extensions instead of adding Makefile hacks. I don't think it's sustainable to keep adding this stuff. We chose Sphinx because it is extensible, and to avoid the Rube Goldberg machine that the previous documentation build system was.So I feel like we've (me included) have kind of sent Breno around in circles on this one. This *was* implemented as an extension once: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231103135622.250314-1-leitao@debian.org/ (local) At that time it seemed too complex, and I thought that an external script would lead to a simpler implementation overall. Perhaps I was wrong.I think you are correct. I personally _think_ that the external script is better, mainly because it is self contained, thus, easier to maintain.From a cursory look at the two versions, the actual Python code to read the YAML and write the reST is the same in both cases. (Breno, please correct me if I'm wrong.)
You are correct. They are similar because Sphinx was not bringing much value to what I was trying to do (or I was not able to explore all Sphinx benefit - It was my very first Sphinx plug-in). That said, the plug-in was basically a wrapper around "the Python code", that was re-used for the one-off script. So, moving from one to another was easy.