[RFC PATCH net-next 0/2] RPMsg based shared memory ethernet driver
From: Ravi Gunasekaran <hidden>
Date: 2024-01-30 11:10:00
Also in:
lkml
virtio-net provides a solution for virtual ethernet interface in a virtualized environment. There might be a use-case for traffic tunneling between heterogeneous processors in a non virtualized environment such as TI's AM64x that has Cortex A53 and Cortex R5 where Linux runs on A53 and a flavour of RTOS on R5(FreeRTOS) and the ethernet controller is managed by R5 and needs to pass some low priority data to A53. One solution for such an use case where the ethernet controller does not support DMA for Tx/Rx channel, could be a RPMsg based shared memory ethernet driver. The data plane is over the shared memory while the control plane is over RPMsg end point channel. Two separate regions can be carved out in the shared memory, one for the A53 -> R5 data path, and other for R5 -> A53 data path. The shared memory layout is as below, with the region between PKT_1_LEN to PKT_N modelled as circular buffer. ------------------------- | HEAD | ------------------------- | TAIL | ------------------------- | PKT_1_LEN | | PKT_1 | ------------------------- | PKT_2_LEN | | PKT_2 | ------------------------- | . | | . | ------------------------ | PKT_N_LEN | | PKT_N | ----------------------- Polling mechanism can used to check for the offset between head and tail index to process the packets by both the cores. I initially intended to post this as a query to know whether a RPMsg based shared memory ethernet driver would be an upstream friendly solution or not. But then decided to do some prototyping and share it as RFC hoping the code might help a bit in understanding the approach. There is still quite a handful of work to be done. As of now firmware just helps in registering the RPMsg driver on Linux by announcing the RPMsg device ID. For the purpose of testing, I allocated the memory in Linux and the Tx packet is injected back into the network stack. These test code snippets are under TEST_DEBUG macro. Could you all please share your opinion on this approach? I wanted to get the community feedback before proceeding into further implementation. Please note, I have not included the Makefile, Kconfig in this series. Ravi Gunasekaran (2): net: ethernet: ti: Introduce inter-core-virt-eth as RPMsg driver net: ethernet: ti: inter-core-virt-eth: Register as network device drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter-core-virt-eth.c | 455 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter-core-virt-eth.h | 105 ++++ 2 files changed, 560 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter-core-virt-eth.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter-core-virt-eth.h -- 2.17.1