Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the mm tree
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2024-01-24 09:46:44
Also in:
bpf, linux-next, lkml
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2024-01-24 09:46:44
Also in:
bpf, linux-next, lkml
On 1/24/24 9:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:18:55 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst between commit: 0d57063bef1b ("selftests/bpf: update LLVM Phabricator links") from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit: f067074bafd5 ("selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links") from the bpf-next tree.Andrew, please drop the bpf related commit from your tree.um, please don't cherry-pick a single patch from a multi-patch series which I have already applied.
The BPF one was actually a stand-alone patch targetted at bpf-next: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240111-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links-v2-1-9a7ae976bd64@kernel.org/ (local)