Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2024-01-24

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the mm tree

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2024-01-24 09:46:44
Also in: bpf, linux-next, lkml

On 1/24/24 9:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:18:55 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst

between commit:

   0d57063bef1b ("selftests/bpf: update LLVM Phabricator links")

from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:

   f067074bafd5 ("selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links")

from the bpf-next tree.
Andrew,
please drop the bpf related commit from your tree.
um, please don't cherry-pick a single patch from a multi-patch series
which I have already applied.
The BPF one was actually a stand-alone patch targetted at bpf-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240111-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links-v2-1-9a7ae976bd64@kernel.org/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help