Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/vmware: Add TDX hypercall support
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2024-01-22 18:32:00
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-input, lkml, virtualization
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2024-01-22 18:32:00
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-input, lkml, virtualization
On January 22, 2024 8:32:22 AM PST, Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On 1/9/24 00:40, Alexey Makhalov wrote:quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST +unsigned long vmware_tdx_hypercall(unsigned long cmd, + struct tdx_module_args *args) +{ + if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_VMWARE)) + return ULONG_MAX; + + if (cmd & ~VMWARE_CMD_MASK) { + pr_warn_once("Out of range command %lx\n", cmd); + return ULONG_MAX; + } + + args->r10 = VMWARE_TDX_VENDOR_LEAF; + args->r11 = VMWARE_TDX_HCALL_FUNC; + args->r12 = VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_MAGIC; + args->r13 = cmd; + args->r15 = 0; /* CPL */ + + __tdx_hypercall(args); + + return args->r12; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vmware_tdx_hypercall); +#endifThis is the kind of wrapper that I was hoping for. Thanks. Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
I'm slightly confused by this TBH. Why are the arguments passed in as a structure, which is modified by the wrapper to boot? This is analogous to a system call interface. Furthermore, this is an out-of-line function; it should never be called with !X86_HYPER_VMWARE or you are introducing overhead for other hypervisors; I believe a pr_warn_once() is in order at least, just as you have for the out-of-range test.