Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: add netmem to skb_frag_t
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-01-16 00:01:34
Also in:
lkml
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-01-16 00:01:34
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 03:23:33PM -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
quoted
quoted
You did not answer my question that I asked here, and ignoring this question is preventing us from making any forward progress on this discussion. What do you expect or want skb_frag_page() to do when there is no page in the frag?I would expect it to do nothing.I don't understand. skb_frag_page() with an empty implementation just results in a compiler error as the function needs to return a page pointer. Do you actually expect skb_frag_page() to unconditionally cast frag->netmem to a page pointer? That was explained as unacceptable over and over again by Jason and Christian as it risks casting devmem to page; completely unacceptable and will get nacked. Do you have a suggestion of what skb_frag_page() should do that will not get nacked by mm?
WARN_ON and return NULL seems reasonable? Jason