Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] net: dsa: mt7530: do not set priv->p5_interface on mt7530_setup_port5()
From: Arınç ÜNAL <hidden>
Date: 2024-01-06 15:01:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 4.01.2024 18:42, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 07:43:46AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:quoted
priv->p5_interface and priv->p6_interface are for use on the MT7531 switch. They prevent the CPU ports of MT7531 to be configured again. They are useless for MT7530. Therefore, remove setting priv->p5_interface for MT7530. Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <redacted> ---What makes priv->p5_interface and priv->p6_interface useless for MT7530 as you say? This code in mt753x_phylink_mac_config() seems executed regardless of switch family: case 5: if (priv->p5_interface == state->interface) break; if (mt753x_mac_config(ds, port, mode, state) < 0) goto unsupported; if (priv->p5_intf_sel != P5_DISABLED) priv->p5_interface = state->interface; break; case 6: if (priv->p6_interface == state->interface) break; mt753x_pad_setup(ds, state); if (mt753x_mac_config(ds, port, mode, state) < 0) goto unsupported; priv->p6_interface = state->interface; break;
This is also useless for non-MT7531 switches in the sense that it unnecessarily prevents port 5 and 6 from being reconfigured. There's nothing wrong with configuring them multiple times. These are the remains of before phylink was implemented on this driver so the thought of changing phy_interface_t on the fly was non existent. At that time, it was probably made to apply to all switch models for convenience, as port 5 and 6 are CPU ports so they're highly likely to be fixed links. The reason I don't deal with this code block now is because I will get rid of priv->p5_interface and priv->p6_interface when I also get rid of priv->info->cpu_port_config() with a later patch. Arınç